Xml Rpc Client Mac Xml Rpc Client For Mac

XML-RPC For C and C is designed for Unix and is most tested on unix. As far as we know, it works on any reasonably standard unix. There is also lots of code to make it work on Windows, using Windows native wininet for clients and Windows native http.sys for servers.

Screenshots

Description

XML RPC Client is a Developer Tool that allows you to access and debug XML-RPC web services from the comfort of your desktop.
Using XML RPC Client is easy:
1. Type in the desired XML-RPC Endpoint URL.
2. Type in the specific desired XML-RPC function to call.
3. Now the interesting part… type in the params for your XML-RPC function call using JavaScript syntax for all of the XML-RPC datatypes (including arrays, structs, dates, and base64 values to an arbitrary depth).
4. Click 'Execute'.
Upon completing the function call you will see three groups of information in the main tabbed display:
1. XML Request: This is the raw XML request you have just sent to the server.
2. XML Response: This is the raw XML response you have just received from the server.
3. Object Response: This is a psuedo-code representation of the objects that were returned from the server.
To specify params, you can use JavaScript syntax. For example, say you had a function that accepted a single string argument. You would write the following in the 'Params' text area:
'my arg'
or
'my arg'
If you had a function that accepts two arguments of type integer and boolean:
42, true
If you had a function that accepts a single array argument containing integers:
[1, 2, 3]
A function that accepts a single struct argument:
{name: 'Joe', age: 27, jobs:['developer', 'exotic dancer']}
Note that unlike Python, the struct keys are not quoted.
For the dateTime.iso8601 data type, you use the simple JavaScript Date class in the params text area. For example, if you wanted to call an XML-RPC function with a single param of type dateTime.iso8601 with a value of today's date, you would type the following in the params text area:
new Date()
This would result in something like the following raw XML param:
<dateTime.iso8601>
20051129T18:13:48
</dateTime.iso8601>
For October 26, 1977, you could type any of the following (depending on your locale settings):
new Date('10/26/77') // you might have to reverse the month/day if your default locale is not US
new Date('1977/10/26')
new Date('October 26, 1977')
Resulting raw XML:
<dateTime.iso8601>
19771026T00:00:00
</dateTime.iso8601>
Support for the XML-RPC base64 data type is also implemented. Say you want to send a base64 param with the string value of 'yo dude'. You need this to be encoded into base64 as part of the process:
new Base64Encode('yo dude')
Note that the JavaScript data type used is Base64Encode. This data type not only creates a base64 param out of your string value, it also encodes your string value in the process.
Here's the resulting XML with the string value encoded that will be sent across the pipes:
<base64>
eW8gZHVkZQ
</base64>
So say you have already attained the encoded value for this string (or an image or whatever). You just want that literal value to show up inside the base64 element in the XML request.. you don't want the string value re-encoded again. In that case you use the plain old Base64 custom class in your param string:
new Base64('eW8gZHVkZQ')
You will once again see this in the raw XML request:
<base64>
eW8gZHVkZQ
</base64>

Information

Size
658.3 KB
Compatibility

OS X 10.6 or later

Age Rating
4+
Price
USD 1.99

Supports

  • Family Sharing

    Up to six family members will be able to use this app with Family Sharing enabled.

Using XML-RPC for Web services

Content series:

This content is part # of # in the series: Using XML-RPC for Web services

https://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/?series_title_by=**auto**

This content is part of the series:Using XML-RPC for Web services

Stay tuned for additional content in this series.

Application Gateways

Remember the thrill of watching your first HTML form work? Perhaps you simply e-mailed the contents of the form to yourself or displayed another HTML page with whatever information the user entered. Whatever you did, you created what an information architect would call a two tiered or client/server system. With just a little additional work, the input gathered from a Web form can be stored in a database. In this way, multiple clients can interact with a single database using only their browser. The information stored in the database can be formatted into an appropriate HTML display on demand by CGI scripts. A typical Web application that uses this sort of architecture is a Weblog like SlashDot (see Related topics). The code that generates the HTML page is called the front end and the part that contains the database and business logic is called the back end.

This system works very well until either your database or your Web server can no longer handle the traffic. If the bottleneck lies with your Web server, you may decide to simply add more Web machines to your network. If you connect to your database with native Application Programming Interface (API) calls in your front end, it becomes difficult to change the back end implementation. Switching database vendors or trying to cluster the database servers would mean changing all your front end code. The solution is to separate the presentation logic of the front end from the business logic of the back end, but they still need to be connected. The software that provides the conduit between the front end and the back end is called middleware. And one very simple, open architecture middleware protocol that works well in Web applications is XML-RPC.

XML and RPCs

Remote Procedure Calls (RPC) are not a new concept. A client/server system, RPCs have traditionally been procedures called in a program on one machine that go over the network to some RPC server that actually implements the called procedure. The RPC server bundles up the results of the procedure and sends those results back to the caller. The calling program then continues executing. While this system requires a lot of overhead and latency, it also allows less powerful machines to access high powered resources. It also allows applications to harness the computational muscle of a network of machines. A familiar example of this type of distributed computing is the SETI@Home project (see Related topics).

Mac For Mac OS 8.6 thru Mac OS 9.2.2, see:Download The Sims Complete Collection (for OSX) for Mac.

Dave Winer, of Frontier and Userland fame (see Related topics), helped extend the concept of RPC with XML and HTTP. XML-RPC works by encoding the RPC requests into XML and sending them over a standard HTTP connection to a server or listener piece. The listener decodes the XML, executes the requested procedure, and then packages up the results in XML and sends them back over the wire to the client. The client decodes the XML, converts the results into standard language datatypes, and continues executing. Figure 1 is a diagram showing an actual XML-RPC conversation between a client (requesting the get_account_info RPC) and a listener who is returning the results of that procedure.

Figure 1: Sample XML-RPC conversation

The exciting part about XML-RPC is that it can cross programming language and operating system platforms, allowing clients and servers written in different languages to work together. Perl clients can talk to Java servers; Python listeners can service PHP requests; you can even write XML-RPC programs in bad, old C. XML-RPC is extremely easy to work with because the details of the XML translations are hidden from the user, unless, of course, you are implementing your own XML-RPC library.

There are two important aspects of this protocol that you should keep in mind when building your middleware. XML-RPC is built on HTTP and, like ordinary Web traffic, its stateless conversations are of the request and response variety. There is no built-in support for transactions or encryption. The other important detail to remember is that XML-RPC has a finite set of datatypes. Client procedure arguments and listener return values are mapped in a non-extendable XML subset. In practice, though, XML-RPC's datatypes are often flexible enough to do complex tasks.

Table 1 is lists all the XML-RPC datatypes. Four of these are used far more than the others. For single value datatypes, <sting> and <int>, which respectively denote string and integer data, are the workhorses for most XML-RPC programs.

There are also two kinds of collection datatypes. Simple sequences of arbitrary datatypes are represented with the <array> tag. Records, structures, and associative arrays are represented with the <struct> tag. XML-RPC structures are formed with key-value pairs, which should feel natural to Perl, Python, and PHP coders.

Table 1: XML-RPC datatypes
XML-RPC tagDescription
<string>a sequence of characters
<int>signed or unsigned 32-bit integer values
<boolean>true(1) or false(0)
<double>signed double precision floating point numbers
<dateTime.iso8601>date and time (but no timezone)
<base64>a base64 encoded string
<array>a container for a sequence of datatypes
<struct>a container for key-value pairs

Remote summing: an example

Let's look at a concrete example of XML-RPC in action. Many introductory computer language books create 'hello world' programs which do little more than compile and print a string. An introductory XML-RPC program needs a meatier framework. Because much of your XML-RPC work will be with clients, let's build a client to talk to an XML-RPC listener that defines a sum() procedure, which, unsurprisingly, returns the sum of the two integers that were passed to it. Regardless of the language in which you write an XML-RPC client, you always need to know:

  • The URL and TCP port of the listener
  • The name of the remote procedure.
  • The kind and number of arguments that procedure expects.
  • The kind and number of return values.

This is the sort of information defines an API to the XML-RPC listener. Unfortunately, the XML-RPC specification doesn't provide any standard discovery method for listeners to transmit this information. I recommend using a simple Web page that looks like Table 2.

Table 2: XML-RPC API for sum()
URL:Port:Procedure DefinitionsProcedure NameInputOutputDescription
sum<int>, <int><int>The sum of the two supplied integers will be returned as an <int>

Given this information, we can build the client. Since later in this article there is an extended example of a PHP client, let's see Perl's Frontier::RPC module in action. Don't let the name fool you; this really is Perl's XML-RPC library, which for historical reasons has this unexpected name. This library depends on XML::Parser, which in turn depends on the expat XML parser. Both Perl modules can be found on your nearest CPAN (see Related topics) mirror, but you will need to visit SourceForge for the expat source (see Related topics). The good news is that expat compiles cleanly on most Unix systems, so installation shouldn't be too difficult. Check out the SourceForge expat page to see how well supported your operating system is.

The sum() client

Once you've got Frontier::RPC installed, you may be surprised at how little code it takes to make an XML-RPC call. Listing 1 is a script that makes the RPC with two hard coded integer arguments and prints the results.

Listing 1: A Perl XML-RPC client testing sum()

This script starts with the ever-present 'shbang' line pointing to my installation's Perl interpreter. Lines 4 and 5 turn on warnings. Most readers will recognize use strict, but use warnings may be somewhat unfamilar, because it was recently added to the core Perl distribution. It checks for the same sort of errors that the -w flag does, but it allows for better control over the that are errors are reported. Line 6 brings in our XML-RPC library. Line 8 creates a variable to hold the listener URL that also includes the port number. Line 9 is a simple list of arguments that will be passed to our remote procedure.

The real paydirt is occurs on Line 11 where a new XML-RPC client object is created. This object is initialized with the URL, although no network connection is established yet. This class also provides a very handy debug feature that, when turned on, will print the XML request and response that happens inside the call() method.

Speaking of the call() method, line 15 shows how seemlessly the RPC fits into normal Perl code. The first argument to call() is the name of the remote procedure followed by a list of its arguments. We will see later how to pass around more complex variables like arrays and structures. The return value from the remote procedure is converted into a standard Perl scalar by call and printed.

You may have noticed Perl's Do What I Mean (DWIM) attitude surface in the Frontier::RPC library which figured out that 5 and 2 are integers. You can turn on debugging in the XML-RPC object to verify this. For times when you force the datatype, the Frontier::RPC library provides an object oriented interface to this type casting. Listing 2 shows a code snippit how we would force the value 2 to be sent as a string.

Listing 2: Forced Typecasting in Frontier::RPC

As you can see, we need to bring the Frontier::RPC2 class, which is a base class to Frontier::Client. An instantiated object of this class can coerce values into desired datatypes by creating object containers for the data. The call() method can deal with these objects without additional programming effort for the user.

The sum() server

In many ways, creating a Perl XML-RPC listener is almost easier than creating a client. Listing 3 tells the story.

Listing 3: An XML-RPC listener in Perl

We've seen lines 1-5 before. The class is Frontier::Daemon, which is a subclass of HTTP::Daemon. When an object of this class is instantiated, the method doesn't return. Instead, the program enters a while loop waiting for new connections. In a tour-de-force of subclassing, HTTP::Daemon is itself derived from IO::Socket::INET. This allows a Frontier::Daemon object to be configured to listen to any TCP port by setting the LocalPort attribute. The Linux box on which this script is executing answers many IP addresses. Again, by using an attribute of IO::Socket::INET, we can restrict this listener to a particular IP with the LocalAddr attribute.

The heart of the XML-RPC listener is the methods attribute that points to an anonymous hash that maps the API procedure name to a reference of a real Perl subroutine that will perform the required work. Recall that the API in Table 2 indicates that the listener has a procedure called sum(). There is no requirement in the Perl XML-RPC library that there be a Perl function called sum(). The sum() subroutine is implemented in a direct way. We might want to perform error checking for production code. Notice that sum() is dealing with native Perl scalars and returning a Perl scalar. The library again shields us from the translation to XML.

Simply powerful

Eric Raymond has called XML-RPC 'very much in the Unix spirit' (see Related topics). Its simplicity creates a lower barrier of entry than its big brother SOAP. With XML-RPC, you not only create a gateway for remote users to access your application, but you also give them the freedom to do so with whatever language they want to use.

In the next article, we will take a look at a more complex and practical example of XML-RPC. Many Web sites require users to log in with account names and passwords. Often, users are issued a session IDs that can be used later to recall a particular application state (think about shopping a cart application that has to remember what's in the cart). Next time, we will create a Web service that shields front end PHP code from the back end MySQL system in which the account information is stored.

Downloadable resources

Related topics

  • Read the XML-RPC spec and find links to XML-RPC libraries at the XML-RPC homepage.
  • Dave Winer, who created the Frontier library, runs the Userland community.
  • The SETI@Home project is a popular example of distributed computing.
  • Get the expat source code from SourceForge.
  • Slashdot.org is a popular Weblog for developers.

Comments

Sign in or register to add and subscribe to comments.